Interactivity Items
1. There was a high degree of interactivity in the WBLT.
2. There was a good range of choices in what to do.
3. There was appropriate feedback in the activity.
4. There was a good opportunity for the user to explore features of the WBLT.
5. There were a variety of variables to manipulate to see the effect.
Design Items
6. The layout (visuals, size and spacing of writing, etc.) was effective in presenting the information.
7. The user was in control of the pace of the WBLT.
8. It was easy to navigate through the WBLT
9. The WBLT presented information in multiple formats (e.g. text/audio/video/animation).
10. The design is appropriate for the intended audience.
Engagement Items
11. The overall usage of graphics/videos/animations in the WBLT was appealing.
12. The language in the WBLT was easy to understand.
13. A sufficient justification and context is provided to make the WBLT interesting.
14. Students are likely to suggest this WBLT to other students.
Usability Items
15. The WBLT can be adaptable for users with special needs.
16. The help provided by the WBLT was sufficient.
17. The directions were easy to follow.
Content Items
18. The WBLT contained sufficient material for the topic.
19. The WBLT presented information in a logical order.
20. The content coverage was appropriate for the intended audience.
Please comment on whether you would recommend this WBLT for classroom use:
WBLT Evaluation Scale
Monitor: ClassHere is the survey on Survey Monkey .
Here is the link to the Google Doc with the questions and feedback notes.
Interactivity Items
1. There was a high degree of interactivity in the WBLT.
2. There was a good range of choices in what to do.
3. There was appropriate feedback in the activity.
4. There was a good opportunity for the user to explore features of the WBLT.
5. There were a variety of variables to manipulate to see the effect.
Design Items
6. The layout (visuals, size and spacing of writing, etc.) was effective in presenting the information.
7. The user was in control of the pace of the WBLT.
8. It was easy to navigate through the WBLT
9. The WBLT presented information in multiple formats (e.g. text/audio/video/animation).
10. The design is appropriate for the intended audience.
Engagement Items
11. The overall usage of graphics/videos/animations in the WBLT was appealing.
12. The language in the WBLT was easy to understand.
13. A sufficient justification and context is provided to make the WBLT interesting.
14. Students are likely to suggest this WBLT to other students.
Usability Items
15. The WBLT can be adaptable for users with special needs.
16. The help provided by the WBLT was sufficient.
17. The directions were easy to follow.
Content Items
18. The WBLT contained sufficient material for the topic.
19. The WBLT presented information in a logical order.
20. The content coverage was appropriate for the intended audience.
Please comment on whether you would recommend this WBLT for classroom use: